Post Medical Job

Do you have a permanent (full-time or part-time) opening for a high-quality medical specialist? Click Here to post More »

Post Your Resume Here

Are you a healthcare professional working long 12 -14 hour days, too many weekends and holidays, or traveling too far from home? Are you not home for dinner usually or not able to spend enough quality time with your family More »

About US

NSI Healthcare Recruiters is one of the most trusted and reliable recruitment and placement services available to medical professionals in the USA. NSI has been in business for over 29 years and has assisted many healthcare providers in locating and hiring qualified medical professionals. More »

Contact Us

Candidates: Because our posted healthcare jobs are filled quickly we ask that you contact us for the latest updates. Employers: Please post your job here for affordable placement service. More »

Health-Care-Recruiter.com

We at Health-Care-Recruiter.com pride ourselves on the highest quality, personalized-service that medical facilities and medical job applicants alike have come to expect from us. pride ourselves on the highest quality, personalized-service that medical facilities and medical job applicants alike have come to expect from us. More »

 

Daily Archives: February 16, 2016

Insurers And Medicare Agree On Measures Tracking Doctors’ Quality

The federal government and the insurance industry released on Tuesday an initial set of measures of physician performance that they hope will reduce the glut of conflicting metrics doctors now must report.

The measures are intended to make it easier for Medicare, patients, insurers and employers to assess quality and determine pay.

America’s Health Insurance Plans, or AHIP, which represents most insurers, said it was encouraging insurers to add these into contracts it strikes and renews with doctors and hospitals. Medicare already uses some of the measures in its payment programs and plans to add the others, officials said.

Right now, doctors have to report different metrics to each insurer, adding to the paperwork they face and making it hard for anyone to provide a reliable assessment of their overall performance. One study by AHIP analysts of 23 health plans counted 546 distinct measures. Sometimes doctors have to report multiple measures that assess the same thing, such as how many patients’ diabetes improved, because each insurer has its own metric.

Use Our Content
This KHN story can be republished for free (details).

“Everywhere you go in health care people ask for one thing: simplify, simplify, simplify,” said Andy Slavitt, acting administrator of the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The new measures, he said, “will reduce needless complexity for physicians.”

The panel of government and insurance officials released seven groups of measures, each tailored to a type of care: cardiology, gastroenterology, HIV and hepatitis C, oncology, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedics, and primary care. Core measures for other types of care are still being evaluated, and the sets can change as new metrics are developed.

Carol Sakala, an executive at the National Partnership for Women & Families, a consumer-oriented nonprofit, called the measures a “good start” but said “we must continue this work and fill crucial measure gaps,” including ways to get patients’ perspectives on whether their care produced a satisfactory result.

Primary care doctors now must report between 50 and 100 measures to multiple insurers, said Dr. Douglas Henley, CEO of the American Academy of Family Physicians. “As you can imagine, that creates a lot of chaos and confusion as well as administrative burden and complexity,” he said on a conference call announcing the measures.

The new set has 21 metrics for primary care doctors. “This represents a huge step forward,” he said. But if insurers do not consistently adopt them, he said “this effort will be for naught.”

The primary care core measures include ones that gauge whether patients’ blood pressure, depression and blood sugar levels were controlled; whether diabetic patients’ eyes and feet were examined; whether women were appropriately screened for cervical cancer and breast cancer; whether doctors unnecessarily screened females under 21 for cervical cancer; whether doctors screened patients for obesity and came up with a treatment plan and a follow-up visit.

Those measures are also designed for use in some of Medicare’s new experiments in paying doctors proactively taking care of patients, including through accountable care organizations.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Task Force: Not Enough Evidence To Recommend ‘For Or Against’ Universal Autism Screening For Very Young Kids

Sparking strong reaction from doctors and child development experts, an influential task force says there’s “insufficient evidence” to argue definitely that the benefits of screening all young children for autism outweigh the harms.

“There’s not enough evidence for us to recommend for or against screening in children for autism under 30 months,” said David Grossman, vice chair of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and a Seattle pediatrician. “Clinicians need to make a judgment on their own about whether to screen. There is no right answer on that.”

The findings, which apply to children between the ages of 18 months and 30 months who haven’t exhibited any signs of the disorder, were published Tuesday in JAMA.

But some health professionals worry the position could result in pediatricians missing opportunities for early intervention and could exacerbate disparities in treating autism.

This KHN story also ran on CNN.com. It can be republished for free (details).

Autism spectrum disorder, or ASD, is a developmental disability that causes social, communication and behavioral challenges, and it appears to be on the rise. One in 45 children were diagnosed with the disorder in 2014 and 1 in 68 in 2010 up from 1 in 150 in 2000.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, parents of children with ASD often notice developmental problems before the child’s first birthday. Children often show signs of differences in social, communication and fine motor skills as early as six months.

“We know from a lot of research that the earlier you can intervene with any developmental problem — including autism — the better off the child is,” said Benard Dreyer, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics and a practicing pediatrician in New York. Though much is unknown, “what we do know is that screening works. Early intervention is good.”

The task force members say they don’t oppose screening, which typically involves a checklist of questions for parents about their child’s behavior. In fact, it found “adequate evidence” that screening works in identifying autism in children in the 18-to-30-month age group. Grossman also noted that the risks of screening appear to be low.

Rather, the report says, without large, controlled studies, it’s hard to say whether those assessments would help to identify children who might otherwise fall through the cracks — leading to their diagnosis and helping them to get treatment that works.

The task force urges more research, calling for a larger study that measures how treatment affects clinical outcomes for children of varying ages who screened positively for ASD. They also caution that “policy and coverage decisions [should] involve considerations in addition to the evidence of clinical benefits and harms.”

However, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a very different course, instead having practice guidelines in place since 2007 saying that testing every child for autism should be routine. Some pediatrics experts say these guidelines carry enough weight that, regardless of the task force’s recommendations, the screening will be covered by most health insurance. For instance, it is deemed a preventive health service that, under the 2010 health reform, is covered by marketplace plans.

Studies show screenings are accurate. And separate research shows treating patients earlier for autism can help — though there is some debate on how rigorous those studies are, said Michael Silverstein, an associate professor of pediatrics at Boston University School of Medicine. For instance, some had smaller sample sizes or weren’t randomized.

But these findings in isolation are not enough, said Silverstein, who co-authored an op-ed in JAMA analyzing the task force’s recommendation. It doesn’t necessarily prove screenings lead to interventions that improve a child’s health, he said.

But others dispute this point.

“The scientific community has been unequivocal of their support for universal screening for toddlers for autism, regardless of risk status,” said Alycia Halladay, chief science officer at the Autism Science Foundation, a New York-based nonprofit that promotes autism research. Halladay is not affiliated with the task force.

The task force’s expectation, she said, is excessive. Research indicates screenings are effective in diagnosis. Early diagnosis leads to earlier interventions, which are more likely to have an impact, since children’s brains are more malleable at that point, she added. That is reason enough to favor universal screening.

Screening advocates also point to another level of concern.

If pediatricians don’t test all their patients, some said, that could make it even easier to miss cases of early autism, especially with children who are already more likely to go untreated.

Doctors could view the guidelines as reason not to screen children unless they clearly present symptoms, Halladay said. But wellness visits can be 10 minutes, and since the disorder’s symptoms vary, they can be easily overlooked, she added.

Meanwhile, children are already more likely to be diagnosed early and treated if they are white or from middle- to high-income families, research has found. If the responsibility falls on families and pediatricians to notice symptoms and choose screenings, that disparity could worsen.

“The family with a lot of resources that has a strong educational background … is going to raise concerns earlier and is going to push for a referral,” said Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele, an associate professor of psychiatry at Columbia University. “Whereas the family without those resources won’t necessarily push or be in a position to push in the same way.”

Veenstra-VanderWeele wrote an editorial in JAMA Psychiatry criticizing the task force’s approach.

Doctors should consider the patients they serve, Grossman said. If parents are less likely to recognize symptoms, or if families are generally low-income, those doctors can perform screenings more often than not.

But it’s premature, he said, to worry unscreened patients will go neglected. That assumes early screenings definitively do lead to patients getting effective treatment — something Grossman argued remains unclear.

The findings are a call for research to better understand how much early treatment helps compared to later, said Craig Powell, an associate professor of neurology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. He wrote an op-ed in JAMA Neurology assessing the report.

The task force sends the U.S. Congress an annual report highlighting areas that deserve more research funding, Grossman said. He expects to highlight autism as among them.

There, the AAP agrees, Dreyer said.

“We applaud the call for more research,” he said. “But in the interim, until we get more evidence, I would say we need to screen more kids, and we need to get them into services.”

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is a volunteer panel of medical experts that makes recommendations about clinical preventive services. It’s funded by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. It is the same body that sparked controversy in recent years with recommendations that most women need fewer breast cancer screenings.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Viewpoints: Cadillac Tax Politics; Straight Talk About The Budget

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

State Highlights: Conn. Regulators Block Insurer’s Idea To Stop Paying Broker Fees For Some Marketplace Plans; Mo. Tests New Mental Health Program

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Snyder Requests Expanded Medicaid Support For Flint Residents

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Cal. Lawmakers Likely To Pass Replacement Tax On Health Care Plans

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Iowa Medicaid Privatization Bill Unlikely To Pass House; Switch Expected To Proceed As Scheduled

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Obama Takes Aim At Surprise Medical Expenses In Budget

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Florida Regulators OK Aetna’s Acquisition Of Humana

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Abortion Debate Adjusts As Gene-Editing Moves From Sci-Fi Impossibility To Attainable Reality

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS